A study co-authored by researchers at Duke University and EWG has detected evidence of a common nail polish chemical called triphenyl phosphate, or TPHP, in the bodies of every woman who volunteered to paint her nails for the study.
The results represent compelling evidence that TPHP, a suspected
endocrine-disrupting chemical also used in plastics manufacturing and as
a fire retardant in foam furniture, enters the human body via nail
polish. These results are troubling because a growing body of scientific
data from other studies indicates that TPHP causes endocrine
disruption, meaning that it interferes with normal hormone functioning.
In animal studies, it has caused reproductive and developmental
irregularities. (Some studies use the acronym TPP for this chemical.)
TPHP is listed on the ingredient labels of a wide array of nail
polishes now on the market. Fully 49 percent of more than 3,000 nail
polishes and treatments compiled in EWG’s Skin Deep database disclose
that they contain TPHP. Even worse, some polishes contain it but don’t
disclose it.
The Duke-EWG study, published October 19, 2015 in Environment
International, tested 10 nail polishes in all for TPHP and found it in
eight of them.
Importantly, two of the eight polishes that tested positive for
TPHP did not disclose its presence on product labels. The Duke
researchers decided not to make public the names of those two polishes
or the six others that contained TPHP and disclosed it because the lab
tested only 10 samples, not the manufacturers’ entire nail product
lines. As well, the Duke team anticipated that some or all the
manufacturers might update their product labels to disclose their TPHP
use before the study could be published.
The manufacturers likely added TPHP as a plasticizer, to render
their polishes more flexible and durable. The concentrations in the
eight nail polishes with TPHP ranged from 0.49 percent to 1.68 percent
by weight. Clear polishes generally contained more TPHP than colored
polishes.
The study found that when women applied nail polish with TPHP
directly to their nails, the levels of a biomarker of that chemical in
their urine increased sharply. Technically, the researchers tested the
women’s urine for a chemical called diphenyl phosphate or DPHP, which is
created when the body metabolizes TPHP.
Most studies of TPHP involve investigations of its effects on cells
and test animals. A few have associated the chemical with changes in
the hormone and reproductive systems of humans. The most recent studies
are striking—they suggest that TPHP interacts with a protein central to
regulating the body’s metabolism and production of fat cells. Scientists
are conducting more investigations to discover whether, in fact, TPHP
contributes to weight gain and obesity.
Nail polish manufacturers may have turned to TPHP as a replacement
plasticizer for dibutyl phthalate, or DBP, that was added to polish to
improve flexibility. This chemical fell out of use in nail polish
because highly publicized scientific studies showed that DBP and other
phthalates are likely endocrine disruptors and toxic to the reproductive
system.
Urine tests have found that Americans are extensively exposed to
TPHP, probably because it is a common plasticizer and fire retardant
often applied to foam cushioning in furniture. A recent biomonitoring
study by Duke scientists who investigated TPHP exposure in adults found
significantly higher levels of DPHP in women than in men who were tested
in a separate study. These findings suggest that women may absorb more
TPHP through personal care products, such as nail polish, that are
marketed specifically to women.
Another biomonitoring study conducted last year by Duke and EWG
researchers found DPHP, the metabolite of TPHP, in the urine of 95
percent of the adults and 100 percent of the children who participated
(Butt 2014). A separate study by scientists from Duke University and the
University of North Carolina found DPHP in more than 90 percent of
samples collected from pregnant women (Hoffman 2014). An Australian
study found DPHP in more than 95 percent of samples tested, and
researchers in Asia found TPHP in 86 percent of breast milk samples from
Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam (Kim 2014, Van den Eede 2015).
To investigate how TPHP from nail polish was absorbed into the
body, study participants collected urine samples before and after they
applied a polish that was about 1 percent TPHP by weight. When the
participants wore gloves and applied polish to synthetic nails, their
urinary levels of the metabolite DPHP did not change appreciably.
However, when they applied the polish directly to their own nails, the
levels of DPHP in their urine increased sharply.
Normally, most molecules do not permeate nails (Gupchup 1999). The
researchers theorized that other polish ingredients such as solvents
rendered nails more absorbent. They also suspected that the network of
capillaries in the cuticle that surrounds the nail might play a role in
carrying the chemical into the body.
Two to six hours after they painted their nails, 24 of the 26
volunteers in the study had slightly elevated levels of DPHP in their
urine. Ten to 14 hours after polishing their nails, the DPHP levels in
all 26 participants had risen by an average of nearly sevenfold,
suggesting that more of the TPHP had entered their bodies and been
metabolized into DPHP.
Four volunteers collected urine over 48 hours. For three of the
four, their concentrations of DPHP peaked between 10 and 20 hours after
painting their nails.
These results indicate that nail polish may be an important
contributor to short-term TPHP exposure. For frequent users of nail
polish, exposure to TPHP may be a long-term hazard.
EmoticonEmoticon